[/quote]
I think your speaking of WTC 7 here. If you are you have obviously not done your homework. The 9/11 commision could not find an explanation as to why building 7 fell.....the OFFICIAL story can't even explain it. The building fell at freefall speed with almost zero resistance...onto a footprint of itself. It is CLASSIC demolitions. Why did the owner of WTC 7 (Larry Silverstein) say in a PBS interview that they decided to "pull" the building? "PULL" is a standard word in the demolitions world for taking a building down. Why was the building re-insured 6 weeks before 9/11? Why was Rudy Guliani warned that the building would fall? Open your eyes.[quote=GoRRiLLa_ATHeiSt]
Pull is not a term used to describe systematic planned demoltions of building laced with explosive.The confusion is that pull is a term used to tear a weakened building in danger of collapse physically not using demoltions.Silverstein was referring to the occupants of the building.Just exactly how do you set up buildings with demo explosives with all this chaos going on.As for the insurance that is the dumbest thing you have said.Silverstein just assumed the lease 6 weeks prior to.Of course new insurance was issued he had just purchased the lease for the site for over a 100 years Dip*****.Alor of people were warned they were going to fall they looked like they were going to fall.I myself said to my wife the buildings were going to collapse only 5 minutes before they did.they appeared to be slowly angling in one direction.In any case why would even allow Guiliani to go downtown in the first place when they could have warned him before he arrived down there.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GoRRiLLa_ATHeiSt
After reading the official transcripts from the FAA and NORAD that day I may be on the fence on this issue. There was obvious mass confusion that day (brought on by NORAD drills). The orders to shoot 93 down were there according to the transcripts, but if it actually happened Im not sure. The debris field of 8 MILES is not evident of a crash though. If it crashed the debris field would have been limited to the surrounding area as the plane would have been whole at the time of impact. A scattered debris field suggests the plane or parts of the plane were dismembered in the air.
|
This is an easy one and im glad you are on the fence about it.There was a scattered debris field.It was not 8 Miles it was 2 miles.And the only debris found far away were papers,Sheet metal and other lightweight objects.All remains where found very close together to the crash site.And besides at the path 93 was taking if it had been breaking apart and debris was falling it would have been found behind the flight path not in front of it.Thats not what happened the other "debris" was found in front of the crash.This is just another example of people misconstruing facts to suit them by exagerating.
There is no reason they would not have admitted to the shoot down because Americans would have agreed with it.Passengers were going to die regardless.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GoRRiLLa_ATHeiSt
The dismissal of bomb sniffing dogs and the "shut downs" for repairs and upgrades in the week before 9/11 at the Towers arent too suspicious right?
|
This one is about as silly as the secret service.One again something blow out of proportion.First of all Firedrills are a very common thing in the WTC and one company practiced them monthly sometimes they had suprise drills thats one.Secondly any "evacuations" they had were due to security elevations.You going to claim that this is when explosives were brought into the building.Like I stated before are you aware of how complex a demolition is.Now imagine one on such a grand scale as the WTC and then multiple it by 2 because there are 2 identical buildings.Before I completely debunk your dogs claim I will say anyone with an IQ and reason will say to themselves "It would have been very difficult and near impossible to plant demolitions in the short windows they had during evacuations and that is even if they are occuring as frequently as you claim which is also false.Meanwhile once again once person says "Evacuations weeks before" and people jump on the bandwagon.When everyone else claims the number was nothing out of the ordinary than what has been going on for years.Now here is where you really get to feel dumb.Evacuations where as a result of drills and hightened security.There was without a doubt prior to 9/11 hightened security for weeks as was other buildings throughout the country because of terror threats.So dogs were brought in specially to sniff the building for explosives and stand guard at entrances.So my point first of all is that they are not usually there and only one rare occurences of when there are threat alerts throughout the US.So they brought these dogs into to stand guard meanwhile you claim the whole time in the weeks prior to their was "Mass evacuations" and this is when demolitions were being brought in..lol
This would be the absolute worst time to bring in demolitions during the same windown when bomb sniffing dogs are there.Also 9/6 was when they were "Dismissed" so since they could not bring the demos in in the weeks prior with the dogs and security they must have brought it in on 3 days times when these drills or evacs had not been occuring and planted demos without being seen.To say the dogs were dismissed once again tells me you have just been regurgitating what everyonese less tells you or what you have read on radical conspiracy websites and thats because it cannot be odd to dismiss dogs that are not usually there.You try to make it seem like bomb sniffing dogs were the norm @ WTC and that is false they are not.So This was just hightened security returning to normal.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GoRRiLLa_ATHeiSt
Tell me please Mr. MYTH solver......how do so many people (not just firefighters) mistake something for MOLTEN STEEL? How do you explain the accounts of "steel beams dripping molten steel at the ends"? And did you even realize that in order to document the Molten Steel the evidence and rubble would have to be examined? Well guess what?....ALL of the rubble and remains of the Towers and WTC 7 were shipped immediately to Asia for recycling. The evidence was never examined. Suspicious?
|
http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm
This should clear up the steel for you.
And as for it steel being shippied to Asia and being melted down it never happened.I do not know where you get this info but it is false and never occured.All steel was shipped to Staten Island Fresh Kills Landfill about 1 Mile from my fathers house.So once again your just talking out of your @$$ spouting lies and made up rumors you heard.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GoRRiLLa_ATHeiSt
|
LOL...Your not serious a 4 yr old newsmax article.Why dont your try some reputable sources that are more current.Once again your just clinging to anything ebcause you want to believe this was a conspiracy.Never Happened.
Once again let me repeat this country makes money through many different channels.To think we would possible cripple our own economy by creating massive chaos in our own country in the largest city on earth and destory 2 major buildings for the sole puprose of being able to go to Iraq in a few years is ******ed bottomline.
There would have been much simpler ways of doing such.
And do you have any idea of what This terrorist cost our country as well as the cost of going to war?
By the way were is all this money we are making from Iraqs oil.As far is know most of it is going toward a reconstruction.TERRORISTS ARE RIGHT NOW PLANNING ATTACKS..London bombings,Spain and last weeks events.
*I know maybe we should place our country in chaos and make ourselves vulnerable to Nuclear attack from enemies.
*We can also simultaneously suspend all Air traffic throughout the world.Thats great for Commerce.
*Maybe we can try to rig 3 buildings with demolition explosives in an intensely complex and stealthy job which has never been attempted on such a grand scale on a job that would take a minimum of 2-3 weeks and noone see anyone planting them or ever see any of the papers of the intense research that goes into a job of this magnitude.It is nearly impossible.You have a better Chance of having your plane crash because it was struck by lighting taking a trip to a carribean island you just bought because you won the lottery the day before and surviving the crash and being attacked by a shark.
IT DOES NOT HAPPEN.Also there is a reason only a select few companies perform these demolition implosions and it because they are considered the best of what they do.Of course one of them would need to be involved and noone over there is talking either.
There is no logic to the WTC attack.If it were financially motivated right now we would be losing money.
All i have to say is I myself looked into the possiblilty that there was a conspiracy and thought there could have been but reason prevailed and soon enough you realize it is impossible.Unlike you I do not have a one track mind and i can look at things from both angles.Is bush a below average president..yeah he hasnt done much..did we orchestrate 9/11? not a chance in hell.There a much easier and less obvious ways for people that you claim are behind this to make money than 9/11
The funniest thing is that their is no evidence to further and of these nonsense other than a few misquotes and hearsay and speculation.If you want a real conspiracy look at JFK's killing.So tell me again how im the sheep?
Why dont you tell me about the pentagon that was a missile right and not plane?
Linear Mode
