View Full Version : Money trail behind Kerry's stance; Candidate has financial ties to backers of mullahs
shootz66
4 Oct 2004, 4:09 PM EDT
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40744
Sen. John Kerry's call for providing Iran with the nuclear fuel it seeks, even while the regime is believed to be only months away from developing nuclear weapons, is being linked to his campaign contributions from backers of the mullah government in Tehran.
Well, isn't this nice? It's goes to show you who the terrorists want to win in the upcoming election. Now John "French" Kerry wants to give nuclear fuel to a country run by fanatics (who by the way are part of the unsurgency in Iraq) in exchange for a promise to use the fuel for peaceful purposes. Kerry says, that had the President attempted to trust the Iranian government, we could sanction the Iranians should they break that trust.
This sounds familiar. Jimmy Carter, CALL YOUR OFFICE! For those of you who don't understand, Jimmy Carter was involved in getting the North Koreans to discontinue their nuclear program and wins a Nobel Peace Prize. This was precious. The North Koreans lied to us and continued to do what they wanted and Kerry thinks sanctioning Iran will work even as the Ayatollah is urging his scientists to speed-up the process? Hell, sanctions didn't even work in Iraq - "oil for food scandal" sound familiar?
Ready for more? Kerry has supported an Iranian immigrant by the name of Susan Akbarpour. Akbarpou came to the US on a tourist visa! Akbarpour has started a newspaper, a magazine and, most recently, a trade association whose goal is to get sanctions lifted and promote U.S. business and investment in Iran. What's even most amazing is that when she came here, she applied for political asylum -FLIPPER! FLIPPER!
Meanwhile, Kerry has embraced the entire political agenda of Akbarpour and other wealthy Iranian-Americans embracing Tehran. Those positions include:
ending the fingerprinting of Iranian visitors to the U.S.;
Does security mean anything to John Kerry?
expanding "family reunion" visas to allow extended family members of Iranians living in the U.S. to immigrate here legally and in large numbers;
We need to be very careful with this.
offering a "dialogue" with the hard-line, terrorist-supporting clerics in Tehran;
There is no need for a "dialogue" - it doesn't work!
help Iran join the World Trade Organization.
Maybe when their is a non-Islamic regime running the country.
John Kerry clearly lives in La La Land!
[C][E][L][L]
5 Oct 2004, 1:03 AM EDT
I was going to dive into these statements, but then i got to the end of it, and read this.....help Iran join the World Trade Organization.
Maybe when their is a non-Islamic regime running the country.
.......and realized you were a bigot and decided you werent worth it
shootz66
5 Oct 2004, 9:56 AM EDT
[E][L][L]']I was going to dive into these statements, but then i got to the end of it, and read this.....help Iran join the World Trade Organization.
Maybe when their is a non-Islamic regime running the country.
.......and realized you were a bigot and decided you werent worth it
You call me a bigot? It's quite obvious that you have nothing constructive to add to this thread. I guess it's ok by you to let countries that suppress their citizens to be part of the free world?
[C][E][L][L]
5 Oct 2004, 10:48 PM EDT
You're right...I have no right to call you a bigot, because this bull**** isn't even a shred of your own. You copyed and pasted it in its entirety from somewhere else.However...if it isn;t, and those ARE your own thoughts...then yes, watch out big guy....you're a bigot. The religion of Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. It's zealots who (much like ANY religious sect can do) take roughly translated words, and act on them how THEY wanna act on them to suit their own self righteous desires...and yes...christians have been known to do the same, ever hear of the crusades? Barbaric slughtering of men, women and children (born and unborn) all under the flag of the catholic church with the blessings of the pope himself. Be a little more intelligent like you portray yourself to be, and stop making this "war" a religious war. It's really not.
Cliff
5 Oct 2004, 11:09 PM EDT
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40744
Sen. John Kerry's call for providing Iran with the nuclear fuel it seeks, even while the regime is believed to be only months away from developing nuclear weapons, is being linked to his campaign contributions from backers of the mullah government in Tehran.
Well, isn't this nice? It's goes to show you who the terrorists want to win in the upcoming election. Now John "French" Kerry wants to give nuclear fuel to a country run by fanatics (who by the way are part of the unsurgency in Iraq) in exchange for a promise to use the fuel for peaceful purposes. Kerry says, that had the President attempted to trust the Iranian government, we could sanction the Iranians should they break that trust.
This sounds familiar. Jimmy Carter, CALL YOUR OFFICE! For those of you who don't understand, Jimmy Carter was involved in getting the North Koreans to discontinue their nuclear program and wins a Nobel Peace Prize. This was precious. The North Koreans lied to us and continued to do what they wanted and Kerry thinks sanctioning Iran will work even as the Ayatollah is urging his scientists to speed-up the process? Hell, sanctions didn't even work in Iraq - "oil for food scandal" sound familiar?
Ready for more? Kerry has supported an Iranian immigrant by the name of Susan Akbarpour. Akbarpou came to the US on a tourist visa! Akbarpour has started a newspaper, a magazine and, most recently, a trade association whose goal is to get sanctions lifted and promote U.S. business and investment in Iran. What's even most amazing is that when she came here, she applied for political asylum -FLIPPER! FLIPPER!
Meanwhile, Kerry has embraced the entire political agenda of Akbarpour and other wealthy Iranian-Americans embracing Tehran. Those positions include:
ending the fingerprinting of Iranian visitors to the U.S.;
Does security mean anything to John Kerry?
expanding "family reunion" visas to allow extended family members of Iranians living in the U.S. to immigrate here legally and in large numbers;
We need to be very careful with this.
offering a "dialogue" with the hard-line, terrorist-supporting clerics in Tehran;
There is no need for a "dialogue" - it doesn't work!
help Iran join the World Trade Organization.
Maybe when their is a non-Islamic regime running the country.
John Kerry clearly lives in La La Land! I agree.
shootz66
6 Oct 2004, 1:22 AM EDT
[E][L][L]']You're right...I have no right to call you a bigot, because this bull**** isn't even a shred of your own. You copyed and pasted it in its entirety from somewhere else.However...if it isn;t, and those ARE your own thoughts...then yes, watch out big guy....you're a bigot. The religion of Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. It's zealots who (much like ANY religious sect can do) take roughly translated words, and act on them how THEY wanna act on them to suit their own self righteous desires...and yes...christians have been known to do the same, ever hear of the crusades? Barbaric slughtering of men, women and children (born and unborn) all under the flag of the catholic church with the blessings of the pope himself. Be a little more intelligent like you portray yourself to be, and stop making this "war" a religious war. It's really not.
Yes, I did copy & paste - only relevant points. Yes, you are right when you say that "zealots" take words and roughly translate them to their own suiting. However, you are wrong when you say this is not a religous war. The terrorists have stated over and over that all-non Muslims are to be killed. They refer to us as Zionists and America as the "Great Satan." I wasn't around for the crusades, were you? I don't care what religion you practice. However, when you apply the name of religion to order the killing of Jews and Westerners and all non-Muslims, then you are inciting a religious war.
[C][E][L][L]
6 Oct 2004, 2:17 AM EDT
Yes, I did copy & paste - only relevant points. Yes, you are right when you say that "zealots" take words and roughly translate them to their own suiting. However, you are wrong when you say this is not a religous war. The terrorists have stated over and over that all-non Muslims are to be killed. They refer to us as Zionists and America as the "Great Satan." I wasn't around for the crusades, were you? I don't care what religion you practice. However, when you apply the name of religion to order the killing of Jews and Westerners and all non-Muslims, then you are inciting a religious war.
youre missing my point...the terrorists may be at religious war...but we actually "declared" war on them...and its NOT a relgious war
JC
6 Oct 2004, 2:27 AM EDT
Kerry's relationship with Iran isnt:
A) Half as bad as Bush/Cheney with Saudi Arabia
B) 1/10000th As prevalent in the grand scheme of the "war on terror" as is Bush/Cheney's with Saudi Arabia
shootz66
6 Oct 2004, 10:32 AM EDT
[E][L][L]']youre missing my point...the terrorists may be at religious war...but we actually "declared" war on them...and its NOT a relgious war
It is a religious war and they fired the first shot a long time ago.
shootz66
6 Oct 2004, 10:34 AM EDT
Kerry's relationship with Iran isnt:
A) Half as bad as Bush/Cheney with Saudi Arabia
B) 1/10000th As prevalent in the grand scheme of the "war on terror" as is Bush/Cheney's with Saudi Arabia
Please entertain me. You are comparing Iran with Saudi Arabia? Granted the Saudis allow Wahabbist(sp) teachings in their kingdom, the Iranians are racing to acquire a nuke and John Kerry would be willing to help and take a chance on these idiots.
B3RGICIDE
6 Oct 2004, 11:40 AM EDT
Please entertain me. You are comparing Iran with Saudi Arabia? Granted the Saudis allow Wahabbist(sp) teachings in their kingdom, the Iranians are racing to acquire a nuke and John Kerry would be willing to help and take a chance on these idiots.
Bush encourages Christian Right fundamentalists to work together with Islamic terror states to oppose civil rights for women and children. To quote: "We have realized that without countries like Sudan, abortion would have been recognized as a universal human right in a U.N. document." Abortion??? How about the "abortion" of thousands of Americans by your Saudi friends on 9/11?
shootz66
6 Oct 2004, 1:32 PM EDT
Bush encourages Christian Right fundamentalists to work together with Islamic terror states to oppose civil rights for women and children. To quote: "We have realized that without countries like Sudan, abortion would have been recognized as a universal human right in a U.N. document." Abortion??? How about the "abortion" of thousands of Americans by your Saudi friends on 9/11?
Bush is working to oppose civil rights for women? I doubt it. The upcoming elections in Afghanistan will have women voters. Women are teaching in Afghanistan and Iraq.
GHawk
6 Oct 2004, 2:07 PM EDT
Bush is working to oppose civil rights for women? I doubt it. The upcoming elections in Afghanistan will have women voters. Women are teaching in Afghanistan and Iraq.
well as long as they can vote and teach, what else do they need anyways!
W2thaooDy
6 Oct 2004, 5:17 PM EDT
well as long as they can vote and teach, what else do they need anyways!
I think he was proving a point GHawk. Muslim faith doesn't allow wemon to do a lot of things, and I think that like 90%-95% of the people their are muslim. So it's not like Bush can do a whole lot to change it.
W2thaooDy
6 Oct 2004, 5:18 PM EDT
Bush encourages Christian Right fundamentalists to work together with Islamic terror states to oppose civil rights for women and children. To quote: "We have realized that without countries like Sudan, abortion would have been recognized as a universal human right in a U.N. document." Abortion??? How about the "abortion" of thousands of Americans by your Saudi friends on 9/11?
I'm pretty sure Saudi's where not responsible for 9/11.
[C][E][L][L]
6 Oct 2004, 6:48 PM EDT
It is a religious war and they fired the first shot a long time ago.
ya think huh? ok buddy...i'm not going to get into a "what came first, chicken or the egg" debate with you. point is...it's NOT a religious war...atleast from where we stand. They may believe it is in their zealous minds. But WE'RE not fighting them BECAUSE theyre muslims...and making ANYTHING "anti-(fill in religion) is very much against what our country was founded on and continues to represent....so congratulations bigot...you're exactly like they are. go join em :thumb:
shootz66
7 Oct 2004, 5:23 PM EDT
[E][L][L]']ya think huh? ok buddy...i'm not going to get into a "what came first, chicken or the egg" debate with you. point is...it's NOT a religious war...atleast from where we stand. They may believe it is in their zealous minds. But WE'RE not fighting them BECAUSE theyre muslims...and making ANYTHING "anti-(fill in religion) is very much against what our country was founded on and continues to represent....so congratulations bigot...you're exactly like they are. go join em :thumb:
Your right. We are fighting them because they are Islamists and have twisted their religion to oppress people of the FREE WORLD. So in essence, we are fighting a sect of people that want to impose religious beliefs on whoever they can. We can debate how much of this war is religious.
[C][E][L][L]
7 Oct 2004, 11:54 PM EDT
Your right. We are fighting them because they are Islamists and have twisted their religion to oppress people of the FREE WORLD. So in essence, we are fighting a sect of people that want to impose religious beliefs on whoever they can. We can debate how much of this war is religious.
we are not fighting them BECAUSE theyre "islamists" if a ****in christian comes across that border with a rocket launcher, he/she is gonna get their **** handed to them just like the others. its not religious.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.